i mean this very literally. enforcing fixed identities on people, and in particular last names, which didn't exist in many areas, was an important step in the growth of the capitalist state, and necessary for bureaucratic control over individual lives. capitalism needs people fixed and pinned down in order to subordinate them to production. accepting such names as 'real' is internalising the machinery of control
and in colonialised nations, the imposition of fixed identities is violent far more than just conceptually. having indigenous names has been made illegal, children forced to take 'real' names. the objective is the eradication of one reality, one self-concept, and its forceful replacement with another
@Syrel_And_Co @Luke @esvrld and shit I just looked up "Archuleta" and it's a lineage that goes back to Queen Isabella and has a registered crest. *that got taken from me* before I ever had a chance to know I could have it. and then, on the other side of that heritage... my father, in an attempt to reconcile with me that didn't actually involve apologizing for or mitigating any of the ways in which he was a giant dick, gave me a genealogy chart he'd researched about his family, and it was... telling, *extremely* telling, how five or six generations back there's a lot of "Signoir Fransisco de Varisa X Native Woman." like. a *lot*.
YAAAAAAY COLONIAL HISTORY IN MY GOT DAMN GENETICS YAAAAAAAAAAAAAY
A Mastodon Instance for the LGBTQIA+ Community